ww2 french tanks ww1 tanks vs modern tanks

Simply put, a Challenger could lay waste to an enemy tank squad before they were even close enough to reliably hit it, shrug off their fire if they did get in range, and outrun enemy tanks if necessary. At 2.5km range, a Tiger's gun only had about a 30% chance of hitting a target, and the shot had lost so much power, it had negligible penetration capabilities.Īdd in that the Challenger is faster than the Tiger, despite being heavier and much more heavily armed and defended, and has 4-5x the travel range on a single tank of gas.and you are dealing with a tank that would be functionally invincible in WWII.especially if your weekly resupply included spare armor to replace any bits that got dinged up by enemy fire. The Abrams uses a smoothbore cannon, the Challenger has a rifled cannon.thus it can safely be assumed that the Challenger has superior range and accuracy as compared to the Abrams. And an Abrams can reliably swat targets at ranges greater than 2.5km. I couldn't find specifics on its range, but it is said to be at least as good as an Abrams, if not better. Even at point blank range, a Tiger would be incapable of cracking the armor of a Challenger II.Ĭonversely, the main gun on a Challenger would hardly notice the armor on a Tiger.

The thinnest armor on an Abrams is 600mm, and is made of an armor that is suggested to be twice as tough as steel. The Challenger II's armor is classified, but it is said to be more heavily armored than the US Abrams. The main gun on the Tiger, generally regarded as the most formidable tank cannon in the entire war, firing armor piercing ammunition, was rating to be able to pierce 171mm of steel armor at 100m.

A Modern Main Battle Tank doesn't generally notice such minor inconveniences.Īrmor and weapon penetration has advanced by great leaps since World War II. For example, most WWII tanks were completely helpless if they hit a muddy field, and some could easily get stuck on trenches.

Tank technology was still relatively new as of World War II, and they had a lot of problems. However, comparing the Tiger to a Challenger II is, to quote a blogger, 'like comparing a Model-T to a Porsche for a race.' Generally, the German Tiger Heavy Tank is regarded as the toughest tank from that era. Honestly, I think that a modern Main Battle Tank could have been a game changer in World War II, despite your concerns.

Ww2 french tanks ww1 tanks vs modern tanks